In the quest to enhance soil management and agricultural productivity, researchers have made a significant stride by combining remote sensing data with conventional soil maps to accurately predict soil organic carbon (SOC) content. This innovative approach, detailed in a recent study published in the IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, could revolutionize how farmers and agronomists assess and manage soil health.
Soil organic carbon is a critical indicator of soil health and fertility. Its spatial distribution is traditionally assessed using digital soil mapping (DSM) methods, where remote sensing data play a pivotal role. However, conventional soil maps, which provide valuable information, are not frequently employed as predictors in soil modeling. This study, led by Azamat Suleymanov from the Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Environmental Research at Ufa State Petroleum Technological University in Russia, sought to change that.
The research team explored and compared the utilization of a multitemporal mosaic of Sentinel-2 (S2) data, in combination with a conventional soil map, for SOC mapping in Chernozem soils of the forest-steppe zone. Chernozems, known for their high organic carbon content, are some of the world’s most fertile soils, making this research particularly relevant for agricultural regions.
The study implemented two algorithms—partial least square regression (PLSR) and random forest (RF)—to estimate SOC content in the topsoil (0-30 cm) under several scenarios. Initially, the team used a temporal mosaic of S2 bare soil spectra and a large-scale soil type map as predictive covariates. “We found that using solely the bare soil temporal mosaic spectra, PLSR proved more effective than RF to predict SOC,” Suleymanov explained. This finding underscores the importance of selecting the right algorithm for specific data types.
The PLSR-derived map of SOC predictions was then combined with the soil type map using RF. This combination led to the best SOC prediction performance and least uncertainty. “Our findings indicate that integrating a soil map into a remote-sensing-based DSM prediction of SOC yields benefits in SOC mapping compared to using solely remote sensing or soil map data,” Suleymanov noted.
The implications of this research for the agriculture sector are substantial. Accurate SOC mapping can help farmers optimize fertilizer use, improve soil health, and enhance crop yields. By integrating remote sensing data with conventional soil maps, agronomists can gain a more comprehensive understanding of soil conditions, enabling them to make informed decisions about soil management practices.
This study not only advances the field of digital soil mapping but also highlights the potential of combining different data sources to improve predictive models. As Suleymanov and his team continue to refine these methods, the agriculture industry can look forward to more precise and efficient soil management tools. The future of agriculture lies in the synergetic integration of technology and traditional knowledge, and this research is a testament to that vision.

