In the wake of Brexit, England has been reimagining its agricultural support systems, and a recent study published in the *International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability* has put a spotlight on whether the new Environmental Land Management (ELM) schemes are truly meeting the needs of regenerative farmers. Led by Richard Cooke from the University of Hertfordshire, the research delves into the intricacies of the Sustainable Farming Incentive and the revised Countryside Stewardship, comparing them against the core principles of regenerative agriculture.
Regenerative agriculture is more than just a buzzword—it’s a holistic approach to farming that prioritizes soil health, biodiversity, and resilience, all while producing food. The study introduces an innovative qualitative scoring system to evaluate how well the new ELM schemes align with these principles. The findings are promising but not without caveats. “The new schemes meet many of the principles of regenerative farming,” Cooke explains, “but there’s a significant gap when it comes to the integration of livestock into the production system.”
This gap could have substantial commercial implications for the agriculture sector. Livestock farming is a cornerstone of many regenerative systems, contributing to nutrient cycling, soil fertility, and overall ecosystem health. If the ELM schemes fail to adequately support this aspect, farmers adopting regenerative practices may find themselves at a disadvantage. “As regenerative farming gains more traction, it’s crucial that policy catches up,” Cooke emphasizes. “The example of Scotland, which has already made strides in this area, shows what’s possible.”
The study suggests that future iterations of the ELM schemes must address this oversight to fully support regenerative farmers. This could mean revisiting the incentives and support mechanisms to ensure they encompass the full spectrum of regenerative practices, including livestock integration. “Policy alignment is key,” Cooke notes. “It’s not just about supporting farmers today but ensuring the viability of regenerative agriculture in the long term.”
As the agriculture sector continues to evolve, this research serves as a timely reminder that policy and practice must go hand in hand. The findings could shape future developments in agri-environmental support schemes, encouraging a more holistic approach that truly supports the principles of regenerative farming. For farmers, policymakers, and stakeholders alike, the message is clear: the path to sustainable agriculture is paved with collaboration and continuous improvement.