In the ever-evolving landscape of agriculture, producers are constantly seeking innovative ways to enhance their operations, whether it’s through saving feed, reducing labor, or adopting new technologies. The Agricultural Demonstration of Practices and Technology (ADOPT) program, funded at a rate of 60 per cent federally and 40 per cent provincially under the Sustainable Canadian Agricultural Partnership, has been instrumental in demonstrating new technologies and providing valuable insights for ranchers. Livestock and feed extension specialists have leveraged this funding to explore various technologies, uncovering crucial lessons that can guide producers in making informed decisions.
One of the primary considerations when evaluating new technology is understanding its origin and applicability to local conditions. The project ‘The Effect of Acoustic Pulse Technology on Prevention of Mastitis in Dairy Cattle’ highlighted this point. The technology, developed in Israel and gaining traction in Wisconsin, was found to be impractical in Saskatchewan due to significant differences in production environments. Conversely, the project ‘Remote water quality monitoring with FarmSimple technology’ successfully demonstrated a technology developed in Saskatchewan for local producers, underscoring the importance of regional relevance.
Cost is another critical factor to consider. Some technologies may appear low-cost initially but can incur additional expenses upon implementation. For instance, technologies relying on cell phone towers can become more expensive due to access fees, significantly increasing the overall cost. The ‘Growing Fodder as an Alternative Feed Source’ project illustrated how the cost of the fodder growth system added up quickly, emphasizing the need to account for all potential expenses.
Practicality is also key. A seemingly minor detail, such as the need for an additional applicator, can pose a significant hurdle. In a project investigating new technology for pain reduction at castration for lambs, producers pointed out that requiring another applicator could complicate the process, highlighting the importance of considering practical aspects.
Research credibility adds another layer of trust. Technologies backed by peer-reviewed research can lend credibility and reliability. The project ‘Commercial Replacement Heifer Selection Using Genomic Testing’ utilized commercially available genomic tests based on extensive genetic research, demonstrating the value of scientifically validated technologies. While not being published in a peer-reviewed journal doesn’t necessarily disqualify a technology, it’s an important factor to consider.
Ultimately, producers must evaluate what they stand to gain from adopting new technologies—whether it’s time, money, improved animal health, or a combination of these factors. The project ‘Efficacy of Field-Side Nitrate Testing’ tested handheld nitrate meters, which, despite offering potential time savings, were found to produce 20 per cent false negatives. This could lead to feeding high nitrate feed to livestock, resulting in lost calves and a net financial loss, underscoring the need for critical evaluation.
Experimentation with new technologies and practices can yield significant benefits for farms. The ADOPT projects conducted by livestock and feed extension specialists have demonstrated the potential advantages of adopting new technologies. Producers are encouraged to think critically through sales pitches and ask questions to determine if a technology is right for their operation. Technologies that are developed in Western Canada, low cost, practical, and published may be hard to find but can offer a competitive edge.
For more information about past ADOPT projects or to discuss implementing new technology on your farm, contact the Agriculture Knowledge Centre at 1-866-457-2377.