Valtra Tops GPS Test; Fendt’s Absence Noted in Tech Showdown

In a significant development for precision agriculture, Future Farming has unveiled the first part of its comprehensive GPS comparison test across seven leading tractor brands. As the global agricultural sector continues to embrace technology for improved efficiency and sustainability, the performance of GPS steering systems is increasingly under the spotlight. The results of the comparison reveal that while all seven brands offer excellent GPS steering capabilities, the devil is in the details, with advanced features and user-friendliness setting the top performers apart.

Valtra has emerged as the frontrunner in this technological race, boasting a GPS steering system that marries sophistication with intuitive operation. Hot on its heels is the iconic green and yellow of John Deere, securing a strong second place. These brands are closely followed by New Holland and Massey Ferguson, both of which have demonstrated commendable performances in the GPS arena.

However, the absence of Fendt from the test has been noted; the company was not prepared to provide a pre-production model of their 728 Vario for evaluation. This leaves a gap in the data that could have potentially influenced the rankings.

The test’s methodology was rigorous, focusing on the overall package of each brand’s GPS steering system—its advanced features combined with ease of use. In an interesting twist, the four brands that scored the highest—Valtra, John Deere, New Holland, and Massey Ferguson—all use proprietary hardware and software. Meanwhile, Claas tractors are currently equipped with a Trimble system, which is set to be replaced once the Cemis 1200 screen gains the anticipated U-turn function by the end of 2024.

McCormick and Deutz-Fahr, on the other hand, offer different approaches to GPS technology. McCormick tractors do not come with an in-house GPS system, instead providing options such as the AGI-4-Topcon antenna with a Topcon X25 terminal. Deutz-Fahr uses the iMonitor, essentially a rebranded Topcon X35 screen, leading to a similar user interface with the McCormick’s system.

The test also delved into the intricacies of programmed turning—a feature that automates the tractor’s turns at the headland. This advanced function, while impressive, comes with a learning curve and demands precise setup. Massey Ferguson has only recently incorporated this feature, and it was notably absent in the McCormick model provided for the test. The integration of this function with headland management systems was a particular highlight, showcasing the seamless automation possible in modern tractors.

However, not all is smooth sailing with these advanced systems. The test revealed that certain conditions, such as high driving speeds or small headlands, could pose challenges. Moreover, some brands, like Claas and Deutz-Fahr, do not yet allow the combination of Autoturn functions with headland management, limiting the automation potential.

Another critical aspect of the test was the two-screen strategy employed by some brands, which was unanimously preferred by test drivers. This setup, found in Massey Ferguson, Valtra, Claas, and McCormick, allows for a clearer overview and easier adjustments. In contrast, brands like John Deere, New Holland, and Deutz-Fahr typically feature a single screen, which can often lead to cumbersome menu navigation and a compromised GPS display.

The implications of this comprehensive test are significant for farmers and agricultural businesses looking to invest in new tractors. With GPS technology becoming a staple in modern farming practices, the ability to compare systems based on advanced features and user experience is invaluable. As precision agriculture continues to evolve, these insights will undoubtedly influence purchasing decisions and, ultimately, the efficiency and sustainability of farming operations worldwide.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top